YOUNG

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (21 total)

• Wright v. Estelle, 572 F.2d 1071 (5th Cir. 1978)
  …, and as with the right to represent oneself, Faretta v. California, and the right to forego an appeal, “he need have no good or rational reason for his decision,” Shiflett v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 447 F. 2d 50 at 53-4 (CA4, 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 994, 92 S.Ct. 1267, 31 L.Ed.2d 462 (1972). The wisdom or unwisdom of the defendant’s choice does not diminish his right to make it. The lawyer’s authority is vindicated when he advises his client. Counsel should weigh these considerations and decide in…
• Watts v. Hadden, 651 F.2d 1354 (10th Cir. 1981)
  …lized and there has been an adjudication thereof. Therefore, a YCA offender may also be released earlier than he would be if he were evaluated under general parole statutes. See United States v. Bronson, 449 F. 2d 302 (10th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 994, 92 S.Ct. 1268, 31 L.Ed.2d 463 (1972). This is a factor that is involved in the Youth Corrections Act which is sometimes overlooked, that is, the motivation to achieve rehabilitation so as to obtain release. Also, for this same reason, YCA offender…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• DOE v. Webster, 606 F.2d 1226 (D.C. Cir. 1979)
  …ited States v. Roberts, 515 F. 2d 642, 644 (2d Cir. 1975); Cox v. United States, 473 F. 2d 334, 336 (4th Cir.) cert. denied, 414 U.S. 869, 94 S.Ct. 183, 38 L.Ed.2d 116 (1973); United States v. Bronson, 449 F. 2d 302, 305-06 (10th Cir.) cert. denied, 405 U.S. 994, 92 S.Ct. 1268, 31 L.Ed.2d 463 (1971); United States v. Mollet, 510 F. 2d 625, 628 (9th Cir. 1975).47 [*1238] The Court of Appeals for the First Circuit aptly summed up the prevailing thinking in Mestre Morera v. United States Immigration and Natura…