PRESLER

v.

STATE DIVISION OF HUMAN RIGHTS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (18 total)

• United States ex rel. Neil Bruce Checkman v. Hon. Melvin Laird, 469 F.2d 773 (2d Cir. 1972)
  …te, Due Process in Selective Service Appeals, 39 U.Chi.L. Rev. 331, 357, n. 144 (1972). And we take note that the Solicitor General has confessed error in a case of a denial of a concededly prima facie claim without reasons. Joseph v. United States, 405 U.S. 1006, 92 S.Ct. 1274, 31 L.Ed.2d 473 (1972). That the Court’s thinking was in accord with the Solicitor General’s is indicated by Fein v. Selective Service System, 405 U.S. 365, 92 S.Ct. 1062, 31 L.Ed.2d 298 (1972), decided the week before Joseph, where t…
• Cale v. Volatile, 465 F.2d 1110 (3d Cir. 1972)
  …in the class that he was in before the classification was reopened.” § 1625.11. [*1117] But the question is not free from doubt. In a memorandum filed in the Supreme Court by the Solicitor General in Joseph, Petitioner, v. United States of America, 405 U.S. 1006, 92 S.Ct. 1274, 31 L.Ed.2d 473 (1972), the argument advanced by this appellant received the apparent endorsement of the Solicitor General: Its action [reopening of classification by the local board] must be viewed as based on a finding that the pet…
• United States v. Layne Ronald Rabe, 466 F.2d 783 (7th Cir. 1972)
  …grounds, reason or explanation deprived Rabe of any meaningful appeal. See United States v. Lemmens, 430 F. 2d 619, 622-624 (7 Cir. 1970). As the Solicitor General recently stated in confessing error in Joseph v. United States, vacated and remanded 405 U.S. 1006, 92 [*787] S.Ct. 1274, 31 L.Ed.2d 473 (March 27, 1972), “The underlying rationale of these decisions, although variously formulated, is that some statements of reasons for a Board’s classification is necessary to ‘meaningful’ review, (Cf. Gonzales…