LENHARD

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Layne Ronald Rabe, 466 F.2d 783 (7th Cir. 1972)
  …(Cf. Gonzales v. United States, 348 U.S. 407, 415, 75 S.Ct. 409, 99 L.Ed. 467) of the administrative determination both by the State Appeals Boards and by the courts.” See also memorandum for the United States in Lenhard v. United States, vacated, 405 U.S. 1013, 92 S.Ct. 1296, 31 L.Ed.2d 477 (1972). It would be both ironic and frustrating if the Government was permitted to prevail in a case because the registrant did not appeal when the Government itself had rendered an appeal futile. Indeed, the last tw…
• United States v. Hulsey, 463 F.2d 1071 (7th Cir. 1972)
  …this Court’s decision of March 8, 1972, affirming the judgment of the District Court. The subsequent decisions of the United States Supreme Court in Joseph v. United States, 405 U.S. 1006, 92 S.Ct. 1274, 31 L.Ed.2d 473 and Lenhard v. United States, 405 U.S. 1013, 92 S.Ct. 1296, 31 L.Ed.2d 477 both decided March 27, 1972 dictate reversal of the conviction. Accordingly the decision of the District Court is hereby reversed and the cause remanded for such further proceedings as may be consistent herewith. Rev…
• United States v. Lemuel Leon ORR, Jr., 474 F.2d 1365 (2d Cir. 1973)
  …position, is based not on the record but on Chairman Edwards’ testimony before the Court regarding the Local Board’s policy and practice. This is testimony which the appellant curiously urges was erroneously admitted citing Lenhard v. United States, 405 U.S. 1013, 92 S.Ct. 1296, 31 L.Ed.2d 477 (1972), which vacated our affirmance of Lenhard’s conviction, 455 F. 2d 1406 (2d Cir. 1971),5 and remanded [*1370] the case for our consideration of points raised in the memorandum of the Solicitor General; those point…

  ← 1 / 2 →