DOWELL

v.

JOHNSON, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By (15 total)

• United States v. Lustig, 555 F.2d 737 (9th Cir. 1977)
  …. His identification was verified by that of three other persons who saw Lustig for longer periods. There also was substantial corroborative evidence supporting the conviction. See United States v. Schoore, 449 F. 2d 348, 349 (9 Cir.), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 1018, 92 S.Ct. 1299, 31 L.Ed.2d 481 (1971); United States v. Stin-son, 422 F. 2d 356, 357 (9 Cir. 1969). STATEMENT BY LUSTIG Lustig objects to the introduction into evidence of the statement “you are not going to pin that on me” made after police disco…
• United States v. Ford, 632 F.2d 1354 (9th Cir. 1980)
  …tions to an accused’s absolute right to be present throughout his trial are permitted. United States v. Jackson, 263 F. 2d 282, 283 (2nd Cir. 1959) (per curiam). See also United States v. Arriagada, 451 F. 2d 487, 489 (4th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 1018, 92 S.Ct. 1300, 31 L.Ed.2d 481 (1972). We agree with this reasoning. Although the record suggests that Armstrong’s absence was voluntary,27 we cannot conclusively determine that it was. Even if Armstrong’s absence was involuntary, however, reversal…
• United States v. Murrell Bedford, 519 F.2d 650 (3d Cir. 1975)
  …undertaking with minimal federal involvement, the warrant, assuming proper issuance under state law, need only conform to federal constitutional requirements. See, e. g., United States v. Johnson, 451 F. 2d 1321, 1322 (4th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 1018, 92 S.Ct. 1298, 31 L.Ed.2d 480 (1972); United States v. Coronna, 420 F. 2d 1091, 1092 n.2 (5th Cir. 1970); United States v. Cotham, 363 F.Supp. 851, 855 (W.D.Tex.1973) United States v. Grosso, 225 F.Supp. 161 (W.D.Pa. 1964). An argument can be made…