DUN & BRADSTREET, INC.

v.

KANSAS ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO., INC.

Citator

Cited By (25 total)

• United States v. United States Dist. Court for the E. Dist. of Mich., 407 U.S. 297 (U.S. 1972)
  …Computers and the Bill of Rights,. Hearings before the Subcommittee on Constitutional Rights of the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, 92d Cong., 1st Sess: (1971) (discussed in my dissent from the denial of certiorari in Williamson v. United States, 405 U. S. 1026). Among the Media Papers was the suggestion by the FBI that investigation of dissidents be stepped up in order to “‘enhance the paranoia endemic in these circles and [to] further serve to get the point across there is an FBI agent behind every mai…
• Gelbard v. United States, 408 U.S. 41 (U.S. 1972)
  …of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 offends the Fourth Amendment, as does all wiretapping and bugging, for reasons which I have often expressed elsewhere. E. g., Cox v. United States, 406 U. S. 934; Williamson v. United States, 405 U. S. 1026; Katz v. United States, 389 U. S. 347, 359; Berger v. New York, 388 U. S. 41, 64; Osborn v. United States, 385 U. S. 323, 340; Pugach v. Dollinger, 365 U. S. 458, 459; On Lee v. United States, 343 U. S. 747, 762. In each of the present cases a grand…
• United States v. Amos P. Brown, Sr., 548 F.2d 1194 (5th Cir. 1977)
  …rting records. As to (c), taxpayer testified that he did not remember how much he paid or how much he told the defendant. . Most definitions are substantially similar. In United States v. Williamson, 5 Cir., 1971, 450 F. 2d 585, 589, cert. denied, 405 U.S. 1026, 92 S.Ct. 1297, 31 L.Ed.2d 486, we defined “hearsay” as any out-of-court statement introduced in evidence for the purpose of proving the truth of the matter contained in the statement. [Citing McCormick, Evidence (3d Ed.) § 228; 5 Wigmore, Evidence…