FAIRMAN ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (35 total)

• Sandstrom v. State, 336 So. 2d 572 (Fla. 1976)
  …e of whether schools could regulate the length of hair on males have decided that the right to choose hair length is too insubstantial to support federal jurisdiction. See, for example, Freeman v. Flake, 448 F. 2d 258 (10th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 1032, 92 S.Ct. 1292, 31 U.Ed.2d 489 (1972). Other federal courts have refused to accept that reasoning because “To say that the issue is not ‘substantial’ turns a deaf ear to the basic values of individual privacy and the freedom to caricature one’s own…
• United States v. Diecidue, 603 F.2d 535 (5th Cir. 1979)
  …on the receipt as required by Rule 41(d), Fed.R. Crim.P. This Court has held that defects in the return of a warrant are ministerial in nature and do not invalidate a search. United States v. Wilson, 451 F. 2d 209, 214 (5th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 1032, 92 S.Ct. 1298, 31 L.Ed.2d 490 (1972). Antone’s counsel was present during the search and advised of all items seized, and the item was viewed during pretrial discovery. There has been no showing of prejudice or intentional omission and the evidence…
• United States v. Marx, 635 F.2d 436 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …th the rule was intentional or in bad faith. United States v. Diecidue, 603 F. 2d 535, 562 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 946, 100 S.Ct. 1345, 63 L.Ed.2d 781 (1980); United States v. Wilson, 451 F. 2d 209, 214 (5th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 1032, 92 S.Ct. 1298, 31 L.Ed.2d 490 (1972); United States v. Dauphinee, 538 F. 2d 1, 3 (1st Cir. 1976); United States v. McKenzie, 446 F. 2d 949, 954 (6th Cir. 1971). Failure to deliver a copy of the search warrant to the party whose premises were search…