MINNESOTA

v.

NORTHERN STATES POWER CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Pac. GAS & Elec. Co. v. State Energy Res. Conservation & Dev. Comm'n, 461 U.S. 190 (U.S. 1983)
  …cal supervising authority’s right to control the manufacture of electricity generated by nuclear facilities.” 111 Cong. Rec. 19832 (1965). Our summary affirmance in Northern States Power Co. v. Minnesota, 447 F. 2d 1143 (CA8 1971), summarily aff’d, 405 U. S. 1035 (1972), is fully consistent with this reading of the division of regulatory authority. Minnesota’s effort to regulate radioactive waste discharges from nuclear plants fell squarely within the field of safety regulation reserved for federal regulatio…
• United States v. Marengo Cnty. Comm'n, 731 F.2d 1546 (11th Cir. 1984)
  …nited States v. Executive Committee of the Democratic Party of Greene County, 1966, S.D.Ala., 254 F.Supp. 543; Hadnott v. Amos, 1970, M.D.Ala., 320 F.Supp. 107 (3 judge court), aff’d mem., 1971, 401 U.S. 968, 91 S.Ct. 1189, 28 L.Ed.2d 318, and 1972, 405 U.S. 1035, 92 S.Ct. 1304, 31 L.Ed.2d 576. . The district court cited Nevett v. Sides as authority for its conclusion that apathy, not polarized voting, was responsible for the consistent failure of blacks to win election. There is a critical difference betwe…
• Pac. Legal Found. v. State Energy Res. Conservation & Dev. Comm'n, 659 F.2d 903 (9th Cir. 1981)
  …t of 1954, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2011-2282 (1976 & Supp. III 1979). The history of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 has been reviewed extensively elsewhere, see, e. g., Northern States Power Co. v. Minnesota, 447 F. 2d 1143, 1147-52 (8th Cir. 1971), aff’d mem., 405 U.S. 1035, 92 S.Ct. 1307, 31 L.Ed.2d 576 (1972); Murphy & La Pierre, Nuclear “Moratorium” Legislation in the States and the Supremacy Clause: A Case of Express Preemption, 76 Colum.L. [*920] Rev. 392, 394-410 (1976), and need only be summarized briefly here:…

  ← 1 / 4 →