ANDERSON ET AL.

v.

CALVERT, COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS OF TEXAS, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (18 total)

• Silkwood v. Kerr-McGEE Corp., 464 U.S. 238 (U.S. 1984)
  …ations.11 Those regulations constitute a uniform body of law carefully designed to balance safety and efficiency in nuclear facilities across the country. Northern States Power Co. v. Minnesota, 447 F. 2d 1143, 1153-1154 (CA8 1971), summarily aff’d, 405 U. S. 1035 (1972). The effectiveness of the overall program requires that nuclear policy and regulation be insulated from ad hoc, uninformed and perhaps biased decisionmaking.12 It is reason [*283] able for a nuclear facility to be held liable, even without f…
• Train v. Colo. Pub. Interest Research Grp., Inc., 426 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1976)
  …any agency under the FWPCA. This conclusion is reinforced by Senator Muskie’s reference to the case of Northern States Power Co. v. Minnesota, 447 F. 2d 1143 (CA8 1971). In that case, which was subsequently [*16] affirmed summarily by this Court, 405 U. S. 1035 (1972), the Eighth Circuit had held that the AEA created a pervasive regulatory scheme, vesting exclusive authority to regulate the discharge of radioactive effluents from nuclear power plants in the AEC, and pre-empting the States from regulating s…
• Tidewater Oil Co. v. United States, 409 U.S. 151 (U.S. 1972)
  …ard Fruit & S. S. Co. v. United Fruit Co., 393 U. S. 406, involved an effort of a corporation, not a party, to inspect the divestiture plans being submitted to the District Court pursuant to a consent judgment. Garrett Freightlines v. United States, 405 U. S. 1035, involved an appeal from a defendant dismissed from the antitrust case because of the primary jurisdiction of the Interstate Commerce Commission over the acquisition in question. Sherman Anti-Trust Act of July 2, 1890, e. 647, 26 Stat. 209, 15 U. S…