THOMAS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (25 total)

• United States v. Feola, 420 U.S. 671 (U.S. 1975)
  …e conspiracy, each shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.” See, e. g., United States v. Vilhotti, 452 F. 2d 1186, 1190 (1971), cert. denied, 406 U. S. 947 (1972), and sub nom. Maloney v. United States, 405 U. S. 1041 (1972); United States v. Sherman, 171 F. 2d 619, 623-624 (1948), cert. denied sub nom. Grimaldi v. United States and Whelan v. United States, 337 U. S. 931 (1949). See, e. g., United States v. Polesti, 489 F. 2d, at 824; United States v. Roselli, 4…
• Data Disc v. Sys. Tech. Assocs., Inc., 557 F.2d 1280 (9th Cir. 1977)
  …1977); Taylor v. Portland Paramount Corp., 383 F. 2d 634, 640 (9th Cir, 1967). We are not bound by state cases, although they may be considered persuasive authority. See Fisons Ltd. v. United States, 458 F. 2d 1241, 1249-50 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 1041, 92 S.Ct. 1312, 31 L.Ed.2d 581 (1972); Aftanase v. Economy Baler Co., 343 F. 2d 187, 192-93 (8th Cir. 1965). . If STA’s facts were accepted, and particularly if it became clear that the California negotiations were peripheral or subsidiary to prima…
• Prod. Promotions, Inc. v. Jacques Y. Cousteau, 495 F.2d 483 (5th Cir. 1974)
  …l provision for continuous supervisory rights over use of the reports and film. Atwood Hatcheries v. Heisdorf & Nelson Farms, 5 Cir. 1966, 357 F. 2d 847, 853-54; see Fisons Ltd. v. United States, 7 Cir. 1972, 458 F. 2d 1241, 1251-1252, cert. denied, 405 U.S. 1041, 92 S.Ct. 1312, 31 L.Ed.2d 581. We are inclined to agree with CEMA that the contractual provision for “approval for advertisement use” falls far short of the kind of detailed, systematic, far-reaching control and supervision imposed by the vendor on…