ARNOLD
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1972-04-17
No. 71-6098
405 U.S. 1063 Supreme Court of the United States (1972) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …ns of self-propulsion,” section 72.1 (o) (3). . 406 U.S. at 516, 92 S.Ct. 1749 (Powell, J. and Burger, C. J., dissenting). . Cf. American Waterways Operators, Inc. v. Askew, 335 F.Supp. 1241 (M.D.Fla. 1971) (three-judge court), prob. juris, noted, 405 U.S. 1063, 92 S.Ct. 1501, 31 L.Ed.2d 793 (1972).…
  • Pollock & Riley, Inc. v. Pearl Brewing Co., 498 F.2d 1240 (5th Cir. 1974)
    …plaintiff cannot recover in an anti-trust suit both the difference between the fair market value and the price received at the time of the sale, and the loss of future profits. Albrecht v. Herald Co., 452 F. 2d 124 (8th Cir. 1971), mandamus denied, 405 U.S. 1063, 92 S.Ct. 1493, 31 L.Ed.2d 810 (1972); [*1245] Treble Damages, 80 Harv.L.Rev. at 1566, 1577-86 (1967). In Albrecht, the plaintiff was forced to sell his paper route at less than fair market value because of the defendant’s anti-trust violations. The…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw