STUARD

v.

EYMAN, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Truong Dinh Hung, 629 F.2d 908 (4th Cir. 1980)
  …s’ contention. Whatever the continuing vitality of the concurrent sentence doctrine in other circuits, I thought that it was decently interred in this circuit by the decision in dose v. United States, 450 F. 2d 152, 155 (4 Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 1068, 92 S.Ct. 1513, 31 L.Ed.2d 799 (1972), where we said “there is no legal reason why a concurrent sentence, attached to a longer, valid sen [*923] tence, and already served, and based on what must fairly be deemed constitutionally impermissible eviden…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Webster, 639 F.2d 174 (4th Cir. 1981)
  …0); United States v. Lampley, 573 F. 2d 783, 788 (3d Cir. 1978). See United States v. Truong Dinh Hung, 629 F. 2d 908 (4th Cir. 1980) (Russell, J., concurring and dissenting); Close v. United States, 450 F. 2d 152, 155 (4th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 1068, 92 S.Ct. 1513, 31 L.Ed.2d 799 (1972). In this case, however, we find we cannot predict with certainty whether the RICO convictions will at some future point work some unforeseen harm to the defendants. As the Supreme Court stated in Benton v. Mary…
• United States v. Grant, 549 F.2d 942 (4th Cir. 1977)
  …s that the District Court erred in not granting his motion for severance after the Government indicated that it intended to offer the confession of his co-defendant Grant. In Close v. United States (4th Cir. 1971) 450 F. 2d 152, 153-4, cert. denied 405 U.S. 1068, 92 S.Ct. 1513, 31 L.Ed.2d 799, we indicated our approval of the rule set forth in Section 2.3 of the American Bar Association Project on Minimum Standards for Criminal Justice, Standards Relating to Joinder and Severance (Approved Draft 1968), as q…