LUCAS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (36 total)

• United States v. Kaplan, 554 F.2d 958 (9th Cir. 1977)
  …(1969). The test is whether a joint trial is so prejudicial to one defendant as to require the exercise of that discretion in only one way, that is, by ordering a separate trial.” United States v. Thomas, 453 F. 2d 141, 144 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 1069, 92 S.Ct. 1516, 31 L.Ed.2d 801 (1971). See United States v. Echeles, 352 F. 2d 892, 896 (7th Cir. 1965). In determining whether the trial court abused its discretion, ordinarily we must view its denial of a motion to sever as of the time of denial…
• United States v. Enrico Campanale and Donald Matthews, 518 F.2d 352 (9th Cir. 1975)
  …test is whether a joint trial was so prejudicial to a defendant as to require the exercise of the trial judge’s discretion in only one way, that is, by ordering a separate trial. United States v. Thomas, 453 F. 2d 141 (9th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 1069, 92 S.Ct. 1516, 31 L.Ed.2d 801 (1972). The burden of demonstrating prejudice is a difficult one, and the ruling of the trial judge will rarely be disturbed on review. Tillman v. United States, 406 F. 2d 930, 934 (5th Cir. 1969), citing 8 J. Moore,…
• United States v. Uptain, 531 F.2d 1281 (5th Cir. 1976)
  …F. 2d 289 (5 Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Coco v. United States, 414 U.S. 1064, 94 S.Ct. 570, 38 L.Ed.2d 469 (1973); United States v. Roca-Alvarez, 451 F. 2d 843 (5 Cir. 1971); United States v. Stephenson, 448 F. 2d 768 (5 Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 1069, 92 S.Ct. 1515, 31 L.Ed.2d 800 (1972); United States v. Dupree, 429 F. 2d 564 (5 Cir. 1970); Barnes v. United States, 374 F. 2d 126 (5 Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 917, 88 S.Ct. 246, 19 L.Ed.2d 273 (1967); Parsons v. United States, 189 F. 2d 252 (5…