MCKINNEY, DBA PARIS BOOKSTALL, ET AL.

v.

ALABAMA

Citator

Cited By

• Saf-Gard Prods., Inc. v. Serv. Parts, Inc., 532 F.2d 1266 (9th Cir. 1976)
  ….Ed.2d 545, 549-556 (1966); see Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp., 340 U.S. 147, 152-53, 71 S.Ct. 127, 130-31, 95 L.Ed. 162, 166-67 (1950); Exer-Genie, Inc. v. McDonald, 453 F. 2d 132, 134 (9th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 1075, 92 S.Ct. 1498, 31 L.Ed.2d 809 (1972). The right of exclusivity granted by the Patent Act is an incentive to invention and early disclosure of new devices. Troxel Mfg. Co. v. Schwinn Bicycle Co., 465 F. 2d 1253, 1258 (6th Cir. 1972), cert. denied,…
• United States v. Nixon, 634 F.2d 306 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …a rephrasing of the same question are improper, “if a witness before a grand jury tells two separate and distinct lies, he may be prosecuted on a separate count for each lie.” United States v. Tyrone, 451 F. 2d 16, 18 (9th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 1075, 92 S.Ct. 1494, 31 L.Ed.2d 808 (1972). Here, as shown by examination of the various counts, each question sought information relating to a different aspect of the counterfeiting operation and the proof of each falsehood required the establishment of…
• United States v. McCOMB, 744 F.2d 555 (7th Cir. 1984)
  …separate lies before the grand jury are separately punishable, see United States v. Doulin, 538 F. 2d 466 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 895, 97 S.Ct. 256, 50 L.Ed.2d 178 (1976); United States v. Tyrone, 451 F. 2d 16 (9th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 1075, 92 S.Ct. [*566] 1494, 31 L.Ed.2d 808 (1972), so long as different facts are needed to prove the falsity of each statement, as was the case here. McComb also claims that the guilty verdicts on Counts 10 and 12 are inconsistent both with each other a…