VERMONT
v.
NEW YORK ET AL.

U.S. | 1972-04-24
No. 50
406 U.S. 186 Supreme Court of the United States (1972) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 31 L. Ed. 2d 785 · 92 S. Ct. 1603 · 1972 U.S. LEXIS 66 · SCDB 1971-099
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion by Vermont for leave to file a bill oí complaint invoking our original jurisdiction against New York and against International Paper Co., a New York corporation doing business in New York, is granted. New York and International Paper Co. are given until June 19, 1972, to answer the bill of complaint.

So ordered.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Vermont v. NEW York, 417 U.S. 270 (U.S. 1974)
    …result of discharge of wastes, largely from International’s mills, that company and New York are responsible for a sludge bed in Lake Champlain and Ticonderoga Creek that has polluted the water, impeded navigation, and constituted a public nuisance. 406 U. S. 186. Issue was joined and the Honorable R. Ammi Cutter was appointed Special Master. 408 U. S. 917. Later the United States sought leave to intervene, stating it had numerous interests in these waters under federal statutes. We referred the motion to th…
  • Vermont v. New York, 408 U.S. 917 (U.S. 1972)
    …[Motion to file bill of complaint granted, 406 U. S. 186.] It is ordered that Justice R. Ammi Cutter (retired) be, and he is hereby, appointed Special Master to conduct supplemental proceedings in this case. The Special Master shall have authority to fix the time and conditions for filing additional plead…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw