ROSE

v.

ROSE ET AL. CIR. CT., OAKLAND COUNTY, MICH

Citator

Cited By

• ST. Louis Union Tr. Co. v. Merrill Lynch, 562 F.2d 1040 (8th Cir. 1977)
  …rt. This being the case, it is unnecessary for me to decide whether the plaintiffs established a violation of § 10(b) and Rule 10b-5. I would only note that, in my judgment, Ryan v. J. Walter Thompson Co., 453 F. 2d 444 (2d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 907, 92 S.Ct. 1611, 31 L.Ed.2d 817 (1972), was improperly decided. The trial court should not have awarded punitive damages. The defendants’ actions were not the willful, wanton and malicious type of conduct that punitive damages were designed to punis…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• Zahn v. Int'l Paper Co., 469 F.2d 1033 (2d Cir. 1972)
  …zing jurisdiction over all class members and their claims here is even stronger. See Leather’s Best, Inc. v. S. S. Mormaclynx, 451 F. 2d 800, 809-11 (2 Cir. 1971); cf. Ryan v. J. Walter Thompson Co., 453 F. 2d 444, 446 (2 Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 907 (1972). III. The majority’s reliance on Snyder v. Harris, 394 U.S. 332 (1969), and Clark v. Paul Gray, Inc., 306 U.S. 583 (1939), strikes me as being unsupportable. In Snyder no member of the class had a claim that could satisfy the amount in cont…
• Ayres v. Merrill Lynch, 538 F.2d 532 (3d Cir. 1976)
  …ed to a decision to sell his stock, because it influenced Merrill Lynch’s decision to exercise its option to repurchase, is well answered by the Second Circuit’s opinion in Ryan v. J. Walter Thompson Co., 453 F. 2d 444 (2nd Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 907, 92 S.Ct. 1611, 31 L.Ed.2d 817 (1972). In that case the court began with an observation equally apposite here: This case is another example of a trend we have observed with disturbing frequency, namely, the invocation of the salutary anti-fraud pro…

  ← 1 / 2 →