STINSON

v.

EYMAN, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By

• Fin. Gen. Bankshares, Inc. v. Metzger, 680 F.2d 768 (D.C. Cir. 1982)
  …637, 640 (9th Cir. 1981); State of Arizona v. Cook Paint & Varnish Co., 541 F. 2d 226 (9th Cir. 1976), cert, denied, 430 U.S. 915, 97 S.Ct. 1327, 51 L.Ed.2d 593 (1977); Ryan v. J. Walter Thompson Co., 453 F. 2d 444, 446 (2d Cir. 1971), cert, denied, 406 U.S. 907, 92 S.Ct. 1611, 31 L.Ed.2d 817 (1972). . This court has recognized that Rosado v. Wyman, supra note 8, modifies the apparently absolute directive of the Gibbs dictum. See Baurer v. Planning Group, Inc., 669 F. 2d 770, 775 n.l6 (D.C.Cir. 1981) (once…
• Hughes v. Mathews, 576 F.2d 1250 (7th Cir. 1978)
  …the natural and probable consequences of his own acts but the presumption may be rebutted.” State v. Carlson, 5 Wis.2d 595, 604, 93 N.W. 2d 354, 359 (1958).5 See also State v. Wells, 51 Wis.2d 477, 483-84, 187 N.W. 2d 328, 331 (1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 907, 92 S.Ct. 1614, 31 L.Ed.2d 817 (1972). In the present case, the state trial court instructed the jury on the presumption of intent: “when there are no circumstances to prevent or rebut the presumption, the legal and natural presumption is that death…