CONSUMERS SUPER MARKET #2, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, PETITIONER,
v.
THE UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, D/B/A AN UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATION, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 1967-04-19
No. 35869
THORNAL, C. J., and DREW, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
198 So. 2d 323 Florida Supreme Court (1967) Caution
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. After argument and upon further consideration, we have determined the writ was improvidently issued. The writ must be and is discharged and the petition is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and DREW, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Payroll Transfers Interstate, Inc. v. Forshey, 694 So. 2d 80 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)
    …s and therefore that claim could be resolved outside the receivership proceeding, the latter had to be pursued in the receivership court). Consumers Super Market #2, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyds, 189 So. 2d 648 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966), cert. dismissed, 198 So. 2d 323 (Fla.1967), relied upon by PTI, is distinguishable because the funds involved in that case were held to be part of the receivership estate by the terms of the reinsurance contract. Under the facts of this case we find no merit to the contention that…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw