BRADLEY

v.

WINGO, WARDEN; BRISBON V. ELROD, SHERIFF, ET AL.; AND WOOTEN V. WINGO, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By

• Ohio v. Kentucky, 410 U.S. 641 (U.S. 1973)
  …and Kentucky is the middle of the Ohio River, or, only alternatively, is the 1792 low water mark on the northerly [*644] shore. We referred the motion to the Special Master. 404 U. S. 933 (1971). He held a hearing and in due course filed his report. 406 U. S. 915 (1972). The Master recommended that this Court enter its order denying Ohio’s petition for leave to amend. His conclusion rested on the ground “that the proposed amendment, in any view of its factual allegations, fails as a matter of law to state a…
• Ohio v. Kentucky, 444 U.S. 335 (U.S. 1980)
  …he 1792 low-water mark on the northerly shore. That motion was referred to the Special Master. 404 U. S. 933 (1971). The Special Master held a hearing and in due course filed his report recommending that Ohio's petition for leave to amend be denied. 406 U. S. 915 (1972). Upon the filing of Ohio's exceptions and Kentucky’s reply, the matter was set for hearing. 409 U. S. 974 (1972). After argument, the Special Master’s recommendation was adopted, Ohio’s motion for leave to amend was denied, and the case was r…