FAIR

v.

WIGGINS; GRAHAM V. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, ET AL. (AEROJET-GENERAL CORP. ET AL., REAL PARTIES IN INTEREST); TIMMONS V. PENNSYLVANIA ET AL.; SMART V. UNITED STATES; BAXTER V. DAVIS ET AL.; DENMAN ET AL. V. SCANNELL ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Ambrose, 483 F.2d 742 (6th Cir. 1973)
  …al of his motion, although by renewing the motion at the close of all the proofs, he preserved the question of the sufficiency of the evidence on the record taken as a whole, United States v. Maffei, 450 F. 2d 928, 930 (6th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 938, 92 S.Ct. 1789, 32 L.Ed.2d 138 (1972). Second, in considering whether sufficient evidence supports the jury’s verdict, we do not decide whether the Government has proved the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt; our role is limited to a deter…
• United States v. van Dyke, 605 F.2d 220 (6th Cir. 1979)
  …dant did not renew the motion at the close of all of the evidence. This constituted a waiver of his objection to the denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal on that ground. United States v. Maffei, 450 F. 2d 928 (6th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 938, 92 S.Ct. 1789, 32 L.Ed.2d 138 (1972). [*226] II Appellant next argues that he was denied his sixth amendment right to a speedy trial. Pre-trial proceedings were conducted 214 days after Appellant’s arraignment. The trial commenced 362 days after a…
• United States v. Kilcullen, 546 F.2d 435 (1st Cir. 1976)
  …tates, 320 F. 2d 459 (10th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 966, 84 S.Ct. 483, 11 L.Ed.2d 415 (1964); Jasso v. United States, 290 F. 2d 671 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 858, 82 S.Ct. 97, 7 L.Ed.2d 55 (1961); see also Maffei v. United States; 406 U.S. 938, 92 S.Ct. 1789, 32 L.Ed.2d 138 (1972) (Douglas, J., dissenting from the denial of certiorari); United States v. Calderon, 348 U.S. 160, 164 n.1, 75 S.Ct. 186, 99 L.Ed. 202 (1954); 2 C. Wright, Federal Practice and Procedure § 463 (1969). Kilcullen…