OTTER TAIL POWER CO.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (49 total)

• Almeida-Sanchez v. United States, 413 U.S. 266 (U.S. 1973)
  …earch of petitioner’s automobile was not a “border search,” but upheld its validity on the basis of [*269] the above-mentioned portion of the Immigration and Nationality Act and the accompanying regulation. 452 F. 2d 459, 461. We granted certiorari, 406 U. S. 944, to consider the constitutionality of the search. I No claim is made, nor could one be, that the search of the petitioner’s car was constitutional under any previous decision of this Court involving the search of an automobile. It is settled, of c…
• Otter Tail Power Co. v. United States, 410 U.S. 366 (U.S. 1973)
  …interfering with the establishment of a municipal electric power system. 331 F. Supp. 54. Otter Tail took a direct appeal to this Court under § 2 of the Expediting Act, as amended, 62 Stat. 989, 15 U. S. C. § 29; and we noted probable jurisdiction, 406 U. S. 944. In towns where Otter Tail distributes at retail, it operates under municipally granted franchises which are limited from 10 to 20 years. Each town in Otter Tail’s service area generally can accommodate only one distribution system, making each tow…
• United States v. Peltier, 422 U.S. 531 (U.S. 1975)
  …int, United States v. Miranda, 426 F. 2d 283, was decided in 1970, and the second, United States v. Almeida [*546] Sanchez, 452 F. 2d 459, was decided over strong dissent in 1971 and was pending on certiorari in this Court when Peltier was searched. 406 U. S. 944 (1972). The first decision of the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit approving alien searches by roving patrols without either probable cause or any suspicious conduct was in 1969. Roa-Rodriquez v. United States, 410 F. 2d 1206. And the Court…