CROW ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (52 total)

• Allee v. Medrano, 416 U.S. 802 (U.S. 1974)
  …udge court should not retain jurisdiction to assess damages, Brashear Lines, supra, or to insure enforcement of a decree which it entered adjudging the statute unconstitutional. Cf. Hamilton v. Nakai, 453 F. 2d 152, 160-161 (CA9 1971), cert. denied, 406 U. S. 945 (1972). Any other rule would “encumber the district court, at a time when district court calendars are overburdened, by consuming the time of three federal judges in a matter that was not required to be determined by. a three-judge court.” Rosado…
• United States v. Manfredi, 488 F.2d 588 (2d Cir. 1973)
  …blicity like Marshall v. United States, 360 U.S. 310, 79 S.Ct. 1171, 3 L. Ed.2d 1250 (1959), or Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333, 86 S.Ct. 1507, 16 L. Ed.2d 600 (1966). See also United States v. Palmieri, 456 F. 2d 9, 13-14 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 945, 92 S.Ct. 2054, 32 L.Ed.2d 332 (1972). Judgment affirmed. . Joseph LaCosa, his wife, Madelyn, and his parents, Frank LaCosa and Mary Manfredi LaCosa, lived at 11 Daisey Court, Nanuet, New York. Philip J. Manfredi, now deceased, his sister, Josephi…
• Sw. Airlines Co. v. Tex. Int'l Airlines, Inc., 546 F.2d 84 (5th Cir. 1977)
  …s by injunctions or writs of assistance, in order to avoid the relitigation of questions once settled between the same parties is settled. Id. at 411-12, 14 S.Ct. at 139, 37 L.Ed. at 1126. Hamilton v. Nakai, 9 Cir. 1972, 453 F. 2d 152, cert. denied, 406 U.S. 945, 92 S.Ct. 2044, 32 L.Ed.2d 332, demonstrates the current vitality of this doctrine. . The section states: A court of the United States may not grant an injunction to stay proceedings in a State court except as expressly authorized by Act of Congre…