GRIFFITH
v.
UNITED STATES
GRIFFITH
UNITED STATES
406 U.S. 957
Supreme Court of the United States (1972)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 66 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (65 total)
-
Patterson v. McLean Credit Union, 491 U.S. 164 (U.S. 1989)…ack.” Tr. 2-160 to 2-161. See, e. g., Firefighters Institute for Racial Equality v. St. Louis, 549 F. 2d 506, 514-515 (CA8), cert. denied sub nom. Banta v. United States, 434 U. S. 819 (1977); Rogers v. EEOC, 454 F. 2d 234 (CA5 1971), cert. denied, 406 U. S. 957 (1972). Unnecessary overlap between Title VII and § 1981 would also-serve to upset the delicate balance between employee and employer rights struck by Title VII in other respects. For instance, a plaintiff in a Title VII action is limited to a reco…
-
Meritor Sav. Bank, FSB v. Vinson, 477 U.S. 57 (U.S. 1986)…OC precedent holding that Title VII affords employees the right to work in an environment free from discriminatory intimidation, ridicule, and insult. See generally 45 Fed. Reg. 74676 (1980). Rogers v. EEOC, 454 F. 2d 234 (CA5 1971), cert. denied, 406 U. S. 957 (1972), was apparently the first case to recognize a cause of action based upon a discriminatory work environment. In Rogers, the Court of Appeals for the Fifth [*66] Circuit held that a Hispanic complainant could establish a Title VII violation by…
-
Harris v. Forklift Sys., Inc., 510 U.S. 17 (U.S. 1993)…in that case to environments “ ‘so heavily polluted with discrimination as to destroy completely the emotional and psychological stability of minority group workers,’” id., at 66, quoting Rogers v. EEOC, 454 F. 2d 234, 238 (CA5 1971), cert. denied, 406 U. S. 957 (1972), merely present some especially egregious examples of harassment. They do not mark the boundary of what is actionable. We therefore believe the District Court erred in relying on whether the conduct “seriously affect[ed] plaintiff’s psycholo…
Previewing 3 of 65 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence