MILLER

v.

OREGON

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. REY, 811 F.2d 1453 (11th Cir. 1987)
  …e v. Garza, 185 Neb. 445, 176 N.W. 2d 664 (1970); State v. Alston, 294 N.C. 577, 243 S.E. 2d 354 (1978); State v. Czachor, 82 N.J. 392, 413 A. 2d 593 (1980); State v. Marsh, 260 Or. 416, 490 P. 2d 491 (1971), cert. denied sub nom., O'Dell v. Oregon, 406 U.S. 974, 92 S.Ct. 2420, 32 L.Ed.2d 674 (1972); Commonwealth v. Spencer, 442 Pa. 328, 275 A. 2d 299 (1971); State v. Patriarca, 112 R.I. 14, 308 A. 2d 300 (1973); State v. Ferguson, 84 S.D. 605, 175 N.W. 2d 57 (1970); Kersey v. State, 525 S.W. 2d 139 (Tenn.1…
• Milgo Elec. Corp. v. United Bus. Commc'ns, Inc., 623 F.2d 645 (10th Cir. 1980)
  …h Cir. 1974); Hinde v. Hot Sulphur Springs, Colorado, 482 F. 2d 829 (10th Cir. 1973). Patentability depends on numerous factors we identified in A. E. Staley Manufacturing Company v. Harvest Brand, Inc., 452 F. 2d 735 (10th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 974, 92 S.Ct. 2415, 32 L.Ed.2d 674 (1972): The question of invention and thus, patentability, is one of fact involving consideration of novelty, utility, commercial success, satisfaction of long-felt want, unsuccessful efforts of others, public acquies…
• United States v. Addington, 471 F.2d 560 (10th Cir. 1973)
  …ect to the operation of collateral estoppel on an examination of the record with realism and rationality as to the issues determined. Ashe v. Swenson, supra 397 U.S. at 444, 90 S.Ct. 1189. See Bell v. Kansas, 452 F. 2d 783 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 974, 92 S.Ct. 2421, 32 L.Ed.2d 674. On examining the record in this realistic way, if the issue of guilty knowledge as to the transactions involved here was actually determined in the prior prosecution, a collateral estoppel defense would be available u…