DIXON

v.

BLACKLEDGE, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By (28 total)

• United States v. Sampol, 636 F.2d 621 (D.C. Cir. 1980)
  …we recognize that conservation of time necessarily expended in the criminal judicial process provides strong support for the joint trial of defendants indicted together, see United States v. Hines, 455 F. 2d 1317, 1334 (D.C.Cir.1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 975, 92 S.Ct. 2427, 32 L.Ed.2d 675 (1972); United States v. McDaniel, 538 F. 2d 408, 410 (D.C.Cir.1976); Mardian, supra, at 979, the particular factual circumstances here serve as counterweight to that rationale, and require severance of Ignacio Novo’s…
• United States v. Irie E. Leonard, 494 F.2d 955 (D.C. Cir. 1974)
  …t of which involves, of course, a substantial sacrifice of the public interest in the prosecution of possible witnesses who are themselves implicated in the crimes. . United States v. Hines, 147 U.S.App.D.C. 249, 455 F. 2d 1317, 1334, cert, denied, 406 U.S. 975, 92 S.Ct. 2427, 32 L.Ed.2d 675 (1972), quoting United States v. Krechevsky, 291 F.Supp. 290, 294 (D.D.C.1967). . 402 U.S. 622, 635, 91 S.Ct. 1723, 1730, 29 L.Ed.2d 222 (1971).…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Lemonakis, 485 F.2d 941 (D.C. Cir. 1973)
  …the witnesses’ testimony.15 The action of the trial judge was fully in accord with the broad discretion that was his to exercise under Rule 14, Fed.R.Crim.P.,16 United States v. Hines, 147 U.S.App.D.C. 249, 455 F. 2d 1317, 1334 (1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 975, 92 S.Ct. 2427, 32 L.Ed.2d 669 (1972); United States v. Gambrill, 146 U.S.App.D.C. 72, 449 F. 2d 1148, 1159 (1971), particularly in view of the interests of judicial administration and economy served by a joint trial in a case of this magnitude. See…