SUNDLUN

v.

SUNDLUN; SULLIVAN V. SULLIVAN; PATTERSON V. LASH, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By

• Hill v. State, 358 So. 2d 190 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978)
  …esult of their mental conditions as distinguished from people civilly committed because of only potential danger. See also People v. Lally, supra n. 17; In re Franklin, supra n. 17; State v. Taylor, 158 Mont. 323, 491 P. 2d 877 (1972), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 978, 92 S.Ct. 2428, 32 L.Ed.2d 677 (1972); State v. Warren, 169 Conn. 207, 363 A. 2d 91 (1975); State v. Carter, 64 N.J. 382, 316 A. 2d 449 (1974); and the prolific writings of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.22 Neither…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Brown, 53 F.3d 312 (11th Cir. 1995)
  …efense, with the risk that in so doing he will bolster the Government case enough for it to support a verdict of guilty.” McGautha v. California, 402 U.S. 183, 214, 91 S.Ct. 1454, 1471, 28 L.Ed.2d 711 (1971), reh’g denied by McGautha v. California, 406 U.S. 978, 92 S.Ct. 2407, 32 L.Ed.2d 677 (1972), and vacated in part on other grounds sub nom. Crampton v. Ohio, 408 U.S. 941, 92 S.Ct. 2873, 33 L.Ed.2d 765 (1972). Most important, a statement by a defendant, if disbelieved by the jury, may be considered as…
• United States v. Green, 648 F.2d 587 (9th Cir. 1981)
  …own behalf cannot then claim the privilege against cross-examination on matters reasonably related to the subject matter of his direct examination.” McGautha v. California, 402 U.S. 183, 215, 91 S.Ct. 1454, 1471, 28 L.Ed.2d 711 (1971), (reh. denied, 406 U.S. 978, 92 S.Ct. 2407, 32 L.Ed.2d 677 (1972); Brown v. United States, 356 U.S. 148, 154-55, 78 S.Ct. 622, 626-27, 2 L.Ed.2d 589 (1958); United States v. Lutz, 621 F. 2d at 944. The extent of permissible cross-examination is within the discretion of the tri…