TONASKET

v.

WASHINGTON ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• United States v. Fla. E. Coast Ry. Co., 410 U.S. 224 (U.S. 1973)
  …that section because the appellees were “prejudiced” by that determination within the meaning of that section. Following our decision last Term in United States v. Allegheny-Ludlum Steel Corp., 406 U. S. 742 (1972), we noted probable jurisdiction, 407 U. S. 908 (1972), and requested the parties to brief the question of whether the Commission’s proceeding was governed by 5 U. S. C. § 553,2 [*227] or by §§ 5563 and 557,4 of the Administrative Procedure Act. We here decide that the Commission’s proceeding was…
• Bradley v. United States, 410 U.S. 605 (U.S. 1973)
  …statute, §7237 (d) is ‘[to] be treated as still remaining in force.’ ” 455 F. 2d 1181, 1190, 1191. Accordingly, the Court of Appeals held that the trial judge lacked power to impose a lesser sentence. We granted the petition for writ of certiorari, 407 U. S. 908 (1972), in order to resolve the conflict between the First and Ninth Circuits, see United States v. Stephens, 449 F. 2d 103 (CA9 1971).2 I At common law, the repeal of a criminal statute abated all prosecutions which had not reached final disposit…
• Sugarman v. Dougall, 413 U.S. 634 (U.S. 1973)
  …he Fourteenth Amendment and the Supremacy Clause, and granted injunctive relief. 339 F. Supp. 906 (SDNY 1971).2 Judge Lumbard joined the court’s opinion and judgment, but wrote separately in concurrence. Id., at 911. Probable jurisdiction was noted. 407 U. S. 908 (1972). [*637] I Prior to December 28, 1970, the appellees were employed by nonprofit organizations that received funds through HRA from the United States Office of Economic Opportunity. These supportive funds ceased to be available about that time…