DAVID LAWRENCE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1967-05-10
No. 66-379
Before HENDRY, C. J., and PEARSON and CHARLES CARROLL, JJ.
198 So. 2d 637 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1967) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the trial court did not err in denying relief under Criminal Procedure Rule 1, as the defendant's contentions were without merit.


Facts & Procedural History

Defendant, an unmarried minor, was convicted of two counts of robbery and sentenced to consecutive terms. His conviction and sentence were affirmed on…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, an unmarried minor, was convicted of robbery on two charges and sentenced to a term of eight years in the state penitentiary on each charge, the sentences to run consecutively. Upon appeal, the conviction and sentence were affirmed by this court. Lawrence v. State, Fla.App.1966, 181 So.2d 572.

Defendant is now appealing from an order of the trial court denying him relief under Criminal Procedure Rule 1, F.S.A. Ch. 924 Appendix. Questions presented on appeal are: whether the trial court complied with § 932.38, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. which requires notice to parents or guardians before trial and whether the defendant was denied due process of law by the denial of a preliminary hearing.

We have considered all of the contentions of the defendant and find them to be without merit. See Clay v. State, 143 Fla. 204, 196 So. 462 (1940); Morgan v. State, 113 Fla. 372, 151 So. 697 (1933); Pitts v. State, 88 Fla. 438, 102 So. 554 (1924); McEwen v. Wainwright, Fla.1962, 147 So.2d 317; Brockman v. Cockran, Fla.1961, 127 So.2d 443; Hoffman v. State, Fla.App. 1964, 169 So.2d 38; Wooten v. State, Fla. App.1964, 163 So.2d 305.

No reversible error having been made to appear, the order appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Johnson v. Popp, 204 So. 2d 210 (Fla. 1967)
    …Certiorari denied without opinion. 198 So. 2d 637.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw