JONES

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475 (U.S. 1973)
  …onfinement were cognizable either in federal habeas corpus or under the Civil Rights Act, and that as civil rights actions they were not subject to any requirement of exhaustion of state remedies. We granted certiorari sub nom. Oswald v. Rodriguez, 407 U. S. 919, in order to- consider the bearing of the Wilwording decision upon the situation before us — where state prisoners have challenged the actual duration of their confinement on the ground that they have been unconstitutionally deprived of good-conduct…
• Conover v. Honorable Frank M. Montemuro, Jr., 477 F.2d 1073 (3d Cir. 1972)
  …nson, 404 U.S. 249, 92 S.Ct. 407, 30 L.Ed.2d 418 (1971) (per curiam); McNeese v. Board of Education, 373 U.S. 668, 672, 83 S.Ct. 1433, 10 L.Ed.2d 622 (1963) ; Rodriguez v. McGinnis, 456 F. 2d 79 (2d Cir.), cert. granted sub nom. Oswald v. Rodriguez, 407 U.S. 919, 92 S.Ct. 2459, 32 L.Ed.2d 805 (1972). B. The Civil Rights Act of 1871, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, is an express exception to the anti-injunction statute, 28 U.S.C. § 2283, Michum v. Foster, supra; Cooper v. Hutchinson, 184 F. 2d 119 (3d Cir. 1950). Thus th…
• LaREAU v. Ellis C. MacDOUGALL, 473 F.2d 974 (2d Cir. 1972)
  …to the states. Robinson v. California, supra. It also is clear that a state prisoner may bring an action under the Civil Rights Act. Cooper v. Pate, 378 U.S. 546 (1964). See Rodriguez v. McGinnis, 456 F. 2d 79 (2 Cir. 1972) (en banc), cert. granted, 407 U.S. 919 (1972), and authorities cited therein at 8L See also United States ex rel. Walker v. Mancusi, 467 F. 2d 51, 53-54 (2 Cir. 1972). . Even if the strip cell could be justified for serious offenses, it was a grossly severe penalty for LaReau’s offense.…