JERNIGAN

v.

ECONOMY EXTERMINATING CO., INC., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (32 total)

• Dawson Chem. Co. v. Rohm & Haas Co., 448 U.S. 176 (U.S. 1980)
  …, however, when Monsanto sought to enforce it by suing Rohm and Haas Company (Rohm & Haas), a competing manufacturer, for direct infringement. Monsanto Co. v. Rohm & Haas Co., 312 F. Supp. 778 (ED Pa. 1970), aff’d, 456 F. 2d 592 (CA3), cert. denied, 407 U. S. 934 (1972). The District Court held that propanil had been implicitly revealed in prior art dating as far back as 1902, even though its use as a herbicide had been discovered only recently. 312 F. Supp., at 787-790. Monsanto subsequently dedicated the…
• Schnadig Corp. v. Gaines Mfg. Co., Inc., 494 F.2d 383 (6th Cir. 1974)
  …hese cases, appellant relies on Beckman Instruments, Inc. v. Chemtronics, Inc., 428 F. 2d 555 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 400 U.S. 956, 91 S.Ct. 353, 27 L.Ed.2d 264 (1970), and Monsanto Co. v. Rohm and Haas Co., 456 F. 2d 592 (3rd Cir.), cert, denied, 407 U.S. 934, 92 S.Ct. 2463, 32 L.Ed.2d 817 (1972). These cases are easily distinguishable from the case at bar. In Beckman the patentee deliberately and knowingly concealed a reference that was known to be anticipatory and intentionally made misrepresentations…
• In re Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings in Antibiotic Antitrust Actions. Pfizer, Inc. v. Int'l Rectifier Corp., 538 F.2d 180 (8th Cir. 1976)
  …tent Office, have led to expansion of the defense in recent years to encompass also a wide variety of inequitable conduct short of common law fraud or deceit.11 See, e. g., Monsanto Co. v. Rohm & Haas Co., 456 F. 2d 592, 599 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 407 U.S. 934, 92 S.Ct. 2463, 32 L.Ed.2d 817 (1972). In the instant case, the District Court adopted a far-reaching interpretation of the doctrine, emanating from what the court described as an obligation on Pfizer’s part to disclose to the Patent Office any fac…

  ← 1 / 3 →