CLARK

v.

BOSLOW, INSTITUTION DIRECTOR

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Handler, 476 F.2d 709 (2d Cir. 1973)
  …ocket as in Shillitani — the confinement, in other words, is equally conditional. We hold that Handler was not entitled to a jury trial on the civil contempt charge. Bacon v. United States, 446 F. 2d 667, 668 (9 Cir. 1971), vacated on other grounds, 408 U.S. 915 (1972). Similarly, Handler’s contention that he was denied assistance of counsel at the October 31 hearing at which he was granted immunity rests on a misplaced reliance on United States v. Sun Kung Kang, 468 F. 2d 1368 (9 Cir. 1972). There the cou…
• United States v. Black, 480 F.2d 504 (6th Cir. 1973)
  …467 F. 2d 969, 971 (7 Cir. 1972), rev’d on other grounds, 412 U.S. 434, 93 S.Ct. 2260, 37 L.Ed.2d 56 (1973). It should also be noted that the Supreme Court has remanded two cases for reconsideration in light of Bwher. Campopiano v. United States, 408 U.S. 915, 92 S.Ct. 2487, 33 L.Ed.2d 328 (1972) ; Saglimbene v. United States, 408 U.S. 916, 92 S.Ct. 2488, 33 L.Ed.2d 328 (1972). . The relevant Tennessee statutes read as follows: “40-2402. Competency of defendant. ■ — In the trial of all indictments, pr…
• In re Bacon v. United States, 466 F.2d 1196 (9th Cir. 1972)
  …(1972). On the basis of its decision in Gelbard and in the companion case of United States v. Egan, 408 U.S. 41, 92 S.Ct. 2357, 33 L.Ed.2d 179 (1972), the Supreme Court also reversed our decision in Bacon, referred to above. Bacon v. United States, 408 U.S. 915, 92 S.Ct. 2501, 33 L.Ed.2d 328 (1972), and remanded the cause to this court for further consideration in light of its decision in Gelbard and Egan. The Supreme Court decision in Gel-bard and Egan establishes the proposition that a grand jury witnes…