BROWN ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (22 total)

• Goosby v. Osser, 409 U.S. 512 (U.S. 1973)
  …y that 28 U. S. C. §2281 did not require the assembly of a three-judge court and that dismissal by the single judge was therefore proper, 452 F. 2d, at 40. A petition for rehearing en banc was denied, three judges dissenting. We granted certiorari, 408 U. S. 922 (1972). We reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remand with direction to enter an appropriate order pursuant to 28 U. S. C. § 2281 for the convening of a three-judge court to hear this case. I The single judge clearly erred in holdin…
• DOE v. McMILLAN, 412 U.S. 306 (U.S. 1973)
  …because of the Speech or Debate Clause and that the official immunity doctrine recognized in Barr v. Matteo, supra, barred any liability on the part of the District of Columbia officials as well as the legislative employees.5 We granted certiorari, 408 U. S. 922. [*311] I To “prevent intimidation of legislators by the Executive and accountability before a possibly hostile judiciary,” Gravel v. United States, 408 U. S. 606, 617 (1972), Art. I, § 6, cl. 1, of the Constitution provides that “for any Speech or…
• United States v. Herman, 589 F.2d 1191 (3d Cir. 1978)
  …t to every person’s testimony. Every witness privilege is seriously in derogation of a general and fundamental duty.” In re Grand Jury Proceedings (Matter of Egan), 450 F. 2d 199, 222 (3d Cir. 1971) (en banc) (Gibbons, J., dissenting), cert. denied, 408 U.S. 922, 92 S.Ct. 2479, 33 L.Ed.2d 332 (1972). Accepting my construction of the statute, it necessarily follows that the court has the power to provide the relief requested by the defendant in this case. See Singleton v. Wulff, 428 U.S. 106, 96 S.Ct. 2868…