HARDIN

v.

TEXAS

Citator

Cited By

• Medina v. California, 505 U.S. 437 (U.S. 1992)
  …e best-informed view of the defendant’s ability to participate in his defense. E. g., United States v. David, 167 U. S. App. D. C. 117, 122, 511 F. 2d 355, 360 (1975); United States ex rel. Roth v. Zelker, 455 F. 2d 1105, 1108 (CA2), cert. denied, 408 U. S. 927 (1972). While reasonable minds may differ as to the wisdom of placing the burden of proof on the defendant in these circumstances, we believe that a State [*451] may take such factors into account in making judgments as to the allocation of the burd…
• United States v. Bubar, 567 F.2d 192 (2d Cir. 1977)
  …ubar was not competent to stand trial, including the assertion of his right to be represented by counsel of his own choice. See Pate v. Robinson, 383 U.S. 375 (1966); United States ex rel. Roth v. Zelker, 455 F. 2d 1105, 1108 (2 Cir.), cert, denied, 408 U.S. 927 (1972). Court-appointed counsel on appeal expressly concedes that Bubar was competent to stand trial. There is nothing in the record that indicates Judge Newman thought otherwise. Bubar had no past history of psychiatric treatment. Mee-han, whose op…
• United States v. Vowteras, 500 F.2d 1210 (2d Cir. 1974)
  …82 S.Ct. 1585, 8 L.Ed.2d 810 (1962); United States v. Passero, 290 F. 2d 238, 244 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 819, 82 S.Ct. 36, 7 L.Ed.2d 25 (1961). . United States ex rel. Roth v. Zelker, 455 F. 2d 1105, 1108 & n. 2 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 408 U.S. 927, 92 S.Ct. 2512, 33 L.Ed.2d 340 (1972); United States v. Knohl, 379 F. 2d 427, 435 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 973, 88 S.Ct. 472, 19 L.Ed.2d 465 (1967). . Cf. Zovluck v. United States, 448 F. 2d 339, 342-343 (2d Cir. 1971); Bell v. United Stat…