MARKS

v.

LOUISIANA

Citator

Cited By

• Pulley v. Harris, 465 U.S. 37 (U.S. 1984)
  …lieve that the State of California, through a court of statewide jurisdiction, should be required to undertake proportionality review when examining any death sentence on appeal. I A In Furman v. Georgia, supra, and subsequent orders, see, e. g., 408 U. S. 933-940 (1972), the Court invalidated all death sentences then existing in the various States. Although each of the five Justices concurring in the per curiam opinion of the Court authored a separate opinion, it has since been the accepted holding of Fu…
• United States v. Buckley, 586 F.2d 498 (5th Cir. 1978)
  …of going forward with the evidence, however, he is not entitled to have the jury consider the defense of entrapment. United States v. Harper, 505 F. 2d 924, 926 (5th Cir. 1974); United States v. Groessel, 440 F. 2d 602, 606 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 408 U.S. 933, 91 S.Ct. 2263, 29 L.Ed.2d 713 (1971). Entrapment occurs “when the criminal design originates with the officials of the government, and they implant in the mind of an innocent person the disposition to commit the alleged offense and induce its comm…
• Schick v. Reed, 419 U.S. 256 (U.S. 1974)
  …etroactivity of Furman is equally unclouded. The Court “[has] not hesitated” to give full retroactive effect to the Furman decision. Robinson v. Neil, 409 U. S. 505, 508 (1973). See Stewart v. Massachusetts, 408 U. S. 845 (1972); Marks v. Louisiana, 408 U. S. 933 (1972); Walker v. Georgia, 408 U. S. 936 (1972). The ;per curiam decision struck down both “the imposition and the carrying out” of discretionary death sentences as cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment. 408 U. S., at 239…