MORFORD
v.
HOCKER, WARDEN
MORFORD
HOCKER, WARDEN
408 U.S. 934
Supreme Court of the United States (1972)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Robtoy v. Kincheloe, 871 F.2d 1478 (9th Cir. 1989)…. 3 (9th Cir.1969) (Arizona defendant who received death penalty after trial by jury lacked standing under Jackson only because, under Arizona statute, judge as well as jury could impose the death penalty), judgment vacated in part on other grounds, 408 U.S. 934, 92 S.Ct. 2850, 33 L.Ed.2d 746 (1972). The state further questions Robtoy’s standing under Jackson, arguing that at the time Robtoy was sentenced, there was no disparity between the sentences of defendants who pleaded guilty and defendants who exer…
-
Saunders v. Eyman, 600 F.2d 728 (9th Cir. 1977)…the law that a habeas petitioner bears the burden of showing that he did not have effective assistance of counsel. Wright v. Craven, 412 F. 2d 915, 917 (9th Cir. 1969); Kruchten v. Eyman, 406 F. 2d 304, 312 (9th Cir. 1969), vacated on other grounds, 408 U.S. 934, 92 S.Ct. 2853, 33 L.Ed.2d 748 (1972). To sustain that burden the petitioner must show that counsel was so incompetent or inefficient as to make the trial a farce or a mockery of justice. E.g., United States v. [*730] Martin, 489 F. 2d 674, 677 (9…