GILMORE

v.

MARYLAND

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Dixon, 283 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1973)
  …re reversed in Anderson v. Florida, 408 U.S. 938, 92 S.Ct. 2868, 33 L.Ed.2d 758 (1972); Thomas v. Florida, 408 U.S. 935, 92 S.Ct. 2855, 33 L.Ed.2d 750 (1972); Johnson v. Florida, 408 U.S. 939, 92 S.Ct. 2875, 33 L.Ed.2d 762 (1972); Boykin v. Florida, 408 U.S. 940, 92 S.Ct. 2876, 33 L.Ed.2d 763 (1972); Brown v. Florida, 408 U.S. 938, 92 S.Ct. 2870, 33 L.Ed.2d 759 (1972); Paramore v. Florida, 408 U.S. 935, 92 S.Ct. 2857, 33 L.Ed.2d 751 (1972); Pitts v. Wainwright, 408 U.S. 941, 92 S.Ct. 2856, 33 L.Ed.2d 765 (1…
• Diaz v. State, 815 So. 2d 682 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)
  ….4 We conclude there was no fundamental error and reject the defendant’s argument on authority of Dennis v. State, 817 So. 2d 741 (Fla.2002), and Boykin v. State, 257 So. 2d 251 (Fla.1971), vacated in part on other [*685] grounds, Boykin v. Florida, 408 U.S. 940, 92 S.Ct. 2876, 38 L.Ed.2d 763 (1972). On the final point, we conclude that the trial court’s ruling on the continuance was within its discretion. Affirmed. . The State initially charged the defendant by information with second degree murder. Whe…
• Zant v. Stephens, 462 U.S. 862 (U.S. 1983)
  …furcated trial and permits presentation at the penalty phase of evidence concerning the circumstances of the crime, the defendant’s background and history, and other factors in aggravation and mitigation of punishment. E. g., Delgado v. Connecticut, 408 U. S. 940 (1972), summarily rev’g 161 Conn. 536, 290 A. 2d 338 (1971) (see Conn. Gen. Stat. §53-10 (1968)); Moore v. Illinois, 408 U. S. 786 (1972) (see Ill. Rev. Stat., ch. 38, §1-7 (1963)); Scoleri v. Pennsylvania, 408 U. S. 934 (1972), summarily rev’g 432…