WASHINGTON STATE LABOR COUNCIL, AFL-CIO, ET AL.

v.

PRINCE ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• White v. Regester, 412 U.S. 755 (U.S. 1973)
  …us of population it may be joined in a Representative District with any other contiguous county or counties.” In a separate appeal, we summarily affirmed that portion of the judgment of the District Court upholding the Senate plan. Archer v. Smith, 409 U. S. 808 (1972). Title 28 U. S. C. § 1253 provides: “Except as otherwise provided by law, any party may appeal to the Supreme Court from an order granting or denying, after notice and hearing, an interlocutory or permanent injunction in any civil action, s…
• Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724 (U.S. 1974)
  …t, contrary to the State’s suggestion, that Hall and Tyner have ample standing to challenge the signature requirement. Hereafter, in the text and notes, reference to Hall should be understood as referring also to Tyner. See also Auerbach v. Mandel, 409 U. S. 808 (1972) (3%); Wood v. Putterman, 316 F. Supp. 646 (Md. 1970) (three-judge court), aff’d mem., 400 U. S. 859 (1970) (3%); and Beller v. Kirk, 328 F. Supp. 485 (SD Fla. 1970) (three-judge court), aff’d mem. sub nom. Beller v. Askew, 403 U. S. 925 (1971…
• Comm. for Pub. Educ. & Religious Liberty v. Nyquist, 413 U.S. 756 (U.S. 1973)
  …ing some form of public assistance (e. g., scholarships) made available generally without regard to the sectarian-nonsectarian, or public-nonpublic nature of the institution benefited. See Wolman v. Essex, 342 F. Supp. 399, 412-413 (SD Ohio), aff’d, 409 U. S. 808 (1972). Thus, our decision today does not compel, as appellees have contended, the conclusion that the educational assistance provisions of the “G. I. Bill,” 38 U. S. C. § 1651, impermissibly advance religion in violation of the Establishment Clause…