DAWLEY

v.

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

Citator

Cited By

• John F. White D.B.N. v. United States, 680 F.2d 1156 (7th Cir. 1982)
  …se said power. . Confusion exists as to whether Indiana follows the “significant contacts” or “lex loci de-lictf rule' in tort actions raising conflicts issues. Compare Motteler v. J.A. Jones Construction Co., 457 F. 2d 917 (7th Cir.), cert, denied, 409 U.S. 813, 93 S.Ct. 66, 34 L.Ed.2d 70 (1972) (Indiana follows the significant contacts rule); Gianni v. Fort Wayne Air Service, Inc., 342 F. 2d 621 (7th Cir. 1965) (same); and Watts v. Pioneer Corn Co., 342 F. 2d 617 (7th Cir. 1965) (same), with Witherspoon v…
• Archibald v. Whaland, 555 F.2d 1061 (1st Cir. 1977)
  …DC payments.” The court then excised the second requirement on the basis of the Supreme Court’s summary dismissal of the appeal in Kelley v. Iowa Department of Social Services, 197 N.W. 2d 192 (Iowa 1972), for want of a substantial federal question, 409 U.S. 813, 93 S.Ct. 170, 34 L.Ed.2d 69.2 After an exhaustive analysis of state statutes and case law, the district court concluded that the basic civil support statute, RSA 546 — A, did not create a stepparent support obligation of “general applicability” si…