SAN ANTONIO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT ET AL.

v.

RODRIGUEZ ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• In re Imperial "400" Nat'l, Inc. v. The Jud. Council of the Third Cir., 481 F.2d 41 (3d Cir. 1973)
  …uncil’s actions are untouchable except by the Supreme Court, and we greatly doubt that that Court so thought when it declined to permit the filing of a petition for mandamus. Nolan v. Judicial Council of the Third Circuit of the United States, 1972, 409 U.S. 822, 93 S.Ct. 111, 34 L.Ed.2d 154. On this assumption we pass to the merits after, necessarily, a complex statement of the facts.2 [*43] THE APPEARANCE OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST Appellant, Joseph M. Nolan, Esq., an experienced member of the bankruptcy ba…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• In re Imperial "400" Nat'l, Inc., 486 F.2d 297 (3d Cir. 1973)
  …iction, the Council took the opposite position before the District Court in the mandamus proceeding, 346 P.Supp. 500, 511, before the Supreme Court in the brief which led to the denial of appellant’s motion for leave to file a petition for mandamus, 409 U.S. 822, 93 S.Ct. 111, 34 L.Ed.2d 154, and again in its original brief before us. Chandler was decided long before all of those occasions. Perhaps the Council’s present position is correct, but we have already considered it fully, and will not again. We wi…