UNITED STATES

v.

BISHOP

Citator

Cited By

• Delaney v. State, 342 So. 2d 1098 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)
  …d D.C.A. 1967); Jones v. State, 248 So. 2d 517 (Fla. 3rd D.C.A. 1971); McPhee v. State, 254 So. 2d 406 (Fla. 1st D.C.A. 1971); Kruglak v. State, 300 So. 2d 315 (Fla. 3rd D.C.A. 1974); State v. Barber, 301 So. 2d 7 (Fla.1974); Davis v. United States, 409 U.S. 841, 93 S.Ct. 193, 34 L.Ed.2d 80 (1973). Even if the proper motion had been made, it is doubtful that any error would have been made to appear. Russo v. State, 340 So. 2d 1273 (Fla. 4th D.C.A. 1976). As to the second error urged, no objection to the fi…
• Moor v. Cnty. OF Alameda, 411 U.S. 693 (U.S. 1973)
  …f California law which created vicarious liability against the County for the actions of its officers that violated petitioners’ federal civil rights. Because of the importance of the questions decided by the Court of Appeals, we granted certiorari. 409 U. S. 841 (1972). For reasons stated below, we now affirm that portion of the Court of Appeals’ decision which held that petitioners had failed to establish a cause of action against the County under 42 U. S. C. §§ 1983 and 1988, and that the trial court prop…
• United States v. Bishop, 412 U.S. 346 (U.S. 1973)
  …d by the trial judge, reversed the judgment of the District Court and remanded the case for a new trial. 455 F. 2d 612 (CA9 1972). Since the meaning of “willfully,” as used in the tax crime statutes, has divided the circuits,2 we granted certiorari. 409 U. S. 841 (1972). [*349] We conclude that it was proper and correct for the District Court to refuse the lesser-included-offense instruction. In our view, the word “willfully” has the same meaning in both statutes. Consequently, we reverse and remand so that…