STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,
v.
WILLIAM REDDICK, RESPONDENT
STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,
WILLIAM REDDICK, RESPONDENT
199 So. 2d 99
Florida Supreme Court (1967)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard oral argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Costello v. State, 260 So. 2d 198 (Fla. 1972)…ew he would not be electrocuted. Guilty pleas are voided where judges or prosecutors actually promise defendants they will be given lesser sentences than they in fact receive. (Reddick v. State, Fla.App.1966, 190 So. 2d 340, cert. denied, Fla.1967, 199 So. 2d 99.) We do not believe the result should be different when a defendant has a reasonable basis for relying upon his attorney’s mistaken advice that the judge will be lenient. (See particularly, Brown v. State, Fla.1971, 245 So. 2d 41.) The effect upon t…
-
State v. Herzig, 208 So. 2d 619 (Fla. 1968)…f post-conviction claims and to provide state prisoners with procedural facilities for asserting belatedly acquired rights that were not recognized at the time of their conviction. See Reddick v. State, 190 So. 2d 340 (2d DCA Fla.1966), cert. denied 199 So. 2d 99 (Fla.). It is evident that generally a Rule 1 proceeding may not be used to retry issues and correct errors reviewable only upon direct appeal from a conviction. See Harper v. State, 168 So. 2d 325 (1st DCA Fla.1964), cert. denied 177 So. 2d 15 (Fla…