HANDY

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (50 total)

• United States v. James, 590 F.2d 575 (5th Cir. 1979)
  …nspiracy. United States v. Wright, 491 F. 2d 942, 946 (6th Cir. 1974); United States v. Mendoza, 473 F. 2d 692, 695 (5th Cir. 1972); see text following note 2 supra. But see United States v. Harrell, 436 F. 2d 606, 616 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 846, 93 S.Ct. 49, 34 L.Ed.2d 86 (1972). It seems clear to me that the task for the trial judge in this instance would be to determine these conditions by a preponderance of all the evidence.7 It is immediately apparent that it would not be enough that…
• United States v. Wilson, 421 U.S. 309 (U.S. 1975)
  …ance of this issue in the conduct of criminal trials, and because the view of the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit apparently conflicts with that of the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, Baker v. Eisenstadt, 456 F. 2d 382, cert. denied, 409 U. S. 846 (1972), we granted certiorari. 416 U. S. 981 (1974). We reverse. II Respondents’ refusals to answer, although not delivered disrespectfully, plainly fall within the express language [*315] of Rüle 42 (a),6 and constitute contemptuous conduct. Rule…
• United States v. Partin, 552 F.2d 621 (5th Cir. 1977)
  …and the significance of later behavior.” United States v. Crockett, 514 F. 2d 64, 72 (5th Cir. 1975); see also, e. g., United States v. Harrell, 436 F. 2d 606, 612 & n. 7 (5th Cir. 1970), appeal after remand, 458 F. 2d 655 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 846, 93 S.Ct. 49, 34 L.Ed.2d 86 (1972); United States v. Del Purgatorio, 411 F. 2d 84, 85-86 (2d Cir. 1969). In addition, we doubt whether the prejudicial potential of this evidence was great, for its tendency to link Russell with the Count I conspirac…