FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION

v.

GREENE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (59 total)

• Tenn. Valley Auth. v. Hill, 437 U.S. 153 (U.S. 1978)
  …ent cannot reasonably be applied to projects substantially completed. E. g., Pizitz, Inc. v. Volpe, 467 F. 2d 208 (CA5 1972); Ragland v. Mueller, 460 F. 2d 1196 (CA5 1972); Greene County Planning Board v. FPC, 455 F. 2d 412, 424 (CA2), cert. denied, 409 U. S. 849 (1972). The Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit explained these holdings. “Doubtless Congress did not intend that all projects ongoing at the effective date of the Act be subject to the requirements of Section 102. At some stage of progress, th…
• Aberdeen & Rockfish R.R. Co. v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (scrap), 422 U.S. 289 (U.S. 1975)
  …draft impact, statement shortly after its proposal was made. To the extent to which Calvert Cliffs’ Coordinating Committee v. AEC, 146 U. S. App. D. C. 33, 449 F. 2d 1109 (1971); Greene County Planning Bd. v. FPC, 445 F. 2d 412 (CA2), cert. denied, 409 U. S. 849 (1972); and Harlem Valley Transportation Assn. v. Stafford, 500 F. 2d 328 (CA2 1974), read the requirement that the statement accompany the proposal through the existing agency review processes differently, they would appear to conflict with the sta…
• Scientists' Inst. for Pub. Info., Inc. v. Atomic Energy Comm'n, 481 F.2d 1079 (D.C. Cir. 1973)
  …tly but regulates the private concerns that do.” CEQ, Third Annual Report, supra note 30, at 225. . See, e. g., Davis v. Morton, 10 Cir., 469 F. 2d 593 (1972). . See, e. g., Greene County Planning Board v. FPC, 2 Cir., 455 F. 2d 412, cert. denied, 409 U.S. 849, 93 S.Ct. 56, 34 L.Ed. 90 (1972) ; Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference v. FPC, 2 Cir., 453 F. 2d 463, 481 (1971) ; Calvert Cliffs’ Coordinating Committee v. USAEC, supra note 1. . See, e. g., Lathan v. Volpe, 9 Cir., 455 F. 2d 1111 (1971). . Nat…