WILLIAM FOXWORTH, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1967-05-04
No. I-385
WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
199 So. 2d 129 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1967) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed. See Johnson v. State, 184 So.2d 161 (Fla.1966); Ervin v. State, 189 So.2d 374 (Fla.App. 4th, 1966).

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Schack v. State of Fla. & L. L. Wainwright, 202 So. 2d 824 (Fla. 1st DCA 1967)
    …id complete his sentence for Case No. 6264 on May 20, 1967. However, he is presently being lawfully detained for purpose of serving the sentence which was imposed in Case No. 62-2607. The judgment in this latter case was affirmed in Schack v; State, 199 So. 2d 129 (Fla.App. 4th, 1967). The sentence for that case will terminate on August 25, 1968. At that time appellant is scheduled to begin serving sentence for Case No. 62-2608, which sentence will terminate on November 30, 1969. Appellant is not entitled to…
  • Schack v. State, 201 So. 2d 580 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967)
    …e, defendant also received a two-and-one-half-year sentence in each of two other cases involving the use of a fictitious name in acquiring automobile title certificates. These convictions were affirmed by this court in Schack v. State, Fla.App.1967, 199 So. 2d 129. All three sentences were to run consecutively. Consequently, defendant has not yet begun to serve the five-year sentence and was not prejudiced by the delay caused by counsel’s want of diligence. During the pendency of this appeal the defendant fi…
  • Schack v. Starr, 440 F.2d 378 (5th Cir. 1971)
    …ellant’s complaint is that Attorney Starr unconscionably delayed final adjudication of his direct criminal appeals by failing to timely file the briefs. The appeals ultimately were affirmed after full appellate review. Schack v. State, Fla.App.1967, 199 So. 2d 129; Schack v. State, Fla.App.1967, 201 So. 2d 580. [*379] The district court ordered dismissal of the appeal on two grounds: (1) that the appellant “cannot establish, beyond mere speculation, that he suffered any damage as a result of the delays allege…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw