JOHNSON

v.

TWOMEY, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By (45 total)

• United States v. Abel, 469 U.S. 45 (U.S. 1984)
  …States, 430 U. S. 937 (1977); United States v. Harvey, 547 F. 2d 720, 722 (CA2 1976); United States v. Robinson, 174 U. S. App. D. C. 224, 227-228, 530 F. 2d 1076, 1079-1080 (1976); United States v. Blackwood, 456 F. 2d 526, 530 (CA2), cert. denied, 409 U. S. 863 (1972). We think the lesson to be drawn from all of this is that it is permissible to impeach a witness by showing his bias under the Federal Rules of Evidence just as it was permissible to do so before their adoption. In this connection, the comme…
• United States v. Somers, 496 F.2d 723 (3d Cir. 1974)
  …and Salvia’s “jam joint.” . Similarly, the Second Circuit will look askance when a recall is predicated upon information available at the time of the cross-examination. In United States v. Blackwood, 456 F. 2d 526, 529-530 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 863, 93 S.Ct. 154, 34 L.Ed.2d 110 (1972), the Court indicated that where the relevant documents are available at the time of the original cross-examination, “deference to the trial judge’s discretion [in refusing recall] should be especially broad.” .…
• United States v. Alphonse Sisca, 503 F.2d 1337 (2d Cir. 1974)
  …visions of which are analogous to Section 2518(10)(a), constitutes a waiver of that right. United States v. Ellis, 461 F. 2d 962, 969 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 866 (1972); United States v. Blackwood, 456 F. 2d 526, 529 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 863 (1972); United States v. Bennett, supra, 409 F. 2d at 901; United States v. Weldon, 384 F. 2d 772, 775 (2 Cir. 1967). This is so even when the district court, as here, considers the merits of the suppression motion as well as its timeliness. United…