PETE CONCH, A SINGLE MAN, GROVE BAY VILLAGE, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, ALBERT MARGOLIS AND MILDRED MARGOLIS, HIS WIFE, CONRAD ROBINSON AND HELEN ROBINSON, HIS WIFE AND KYMAN KIRSCHNER, APPELLANTS,

v.

CITY OF MIAMI, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Truluck Herbert Johnson v. State, 348 So. 2d 646 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)
  …ithin the jury’s province to reject the alibi testimony presented in view of Ms. Greene’s and Mr. [*648] Chester’s testimony. See Martin v. State, 100 Fla. 16, 129 So. 112 (1930); Wright v. State, 182 So. 2d 264 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966); Stuckey v. State, 199 So. 2d 137 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967); Jenkins v. State, 208 So. 2d 276 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968); Cason v. State, 211 So. 2d 604 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968); Smith v. State, 221 So. 2d 216 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969); Gilbert v. State, 311 So. 2d 384 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). Affirmed.…
• Williams v. State, 243 So. 2d 215 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971)
  …rm. The evidence of guilt was ample and compelling. In deciding against the defendants on the issues of identity and alibi the jury acted on substantial competent evidence. Fast v. State, Fla.App.1967, 193 So. 2d 210; Stuckey v. State, Fla.App.1967, 199 So. 2d 137. No error was committed by the trial court in denying motions for mistrial. Where mistrial was sought for claimed improper statements or questions by the state or answers of witnesses, the objections of the defendants thereto were sustained, the cla…
• Dove v. State, 287 So. 2d 384 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973)
  …ved was an issue of his whereabouts during the noon hour. That issue was one for determination by the jury, which rejected the alibi evidence as was its province, in face of the evidence placing appellant at the scene of the crime. Stuckey v. State, 199 So. 2d 137 (Fla.App.1967); Kennedy v. State, 153 Fla. 863, 16 So. 2d 45 (Fla.1943); Flowers v. State, 152 Fla. 649, 12 So. 2d 772 (Fla.1943). The granting or denial of Dove’s motion for severance was a matter within the discretion of the court, and the appell…