FIRESTONE

v.

TIME, INC.

Citator

Cited By (20 total)

• Harte-Hanks Commc'ns, Inc. v. Connaughton, 491 U.S. 657 (U.S. 1989)
  …ome debate as to whether the element of falsity must be established by clear and convincing evidence or by a preponderance of the evidence. Compare Firestone v. Time, Inc., 460 F. 2d 712, 722-723 (CA5) (Bell, J., specially concurring), cert. denied, 409 U. S. 875 (1972), with Goldwater v. Ginzburg, 414 F. 2d 324, 341 (CA2 1969), cert. denied, 396 U. S. 1049 (1970). See also Tavoulareas v. Piro, 260 U. S. App. D. C. 39, 63-64, n. 33, 817 F. 2d 762, 786, n. 33 (en banc), cert. denied, 484 U. S. 870 (1987); Fra…
• Parks v. Watson, 716 F.2d 646 (9th Cir. 1983)
  …h amendment, the equal protection clause, or the due process clause. I Klamath’s claim based on the taking clause and the unconstitutional conditions doctrine fails under Honolulu Rapid Transit Co. v. Dolim, 459 F. 2d 551 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 875 (1972) (Honolulu). We held there that the unconstitutional conditions doctrine is not implicated when a governmental body and a private party negotiate the price to be paid for an exchange of property between the two, even though under the contract…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Tavoulareas v. Piro, 817 F.2d 762 (D.C. Cir. 1987)
  …ty by clear and convincing proof. Compare Firestone v. Time, [*787] Inc., 460 F. 2d 712, 722-23 (5th Cir.) (Bell, J., specially concurring) (expressing view that clear and convincing proof standard applies to issue of falsity vel non), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 875, 93 S.Ct. 120, 34 L.Ed.2d 122 (1972) with Goldwater v. Ginzburg, 414 F. 2d 324, 341 (2d Cir.1969) (expressing contrary view), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1049, 90 S.Ct. 701, 24 L.Ed.2d 695 (1970). . Tavoulareas also points to allegations in the Post art…