ENYART

v.

ASHLAND DISCOUNT CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (51 total)

• Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder, 425 U.S. 185 (U.S. 1976)
  …gs against First Securities. In those proceedings all of the respondents except two asserted claims based on the fraudulent escrow accounts. These claims ultimately were allowed in SEC v. First Securities Co., 463 F. 2d 981, 986 (CA7), cert. denied, 409 U. S. 880 (1972), where the court held that Nay’s conduct violated § 10 (b) and Rule 10b-5, and that First Securities was liable for Nay's fraud as an aider and abettor. The question of Ernst & Ernst’s liability was not considered in that case. In their resp…
• Landy v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp., 486 F.2d 139 (3d Cir. 1973)
  …lso subsequent Seventh Circuit opinions following. the same test, Avern Trust v. Clarke, 415 F. 2d 1238, 1242 (7th Cir. 1969); S.E.C. [*166] v. First Securities Co. of Chicago, 463 F. 2d 981, 988 (7th Cir.), cert, denied sub nom. McKy v. Hochfelder, 409 U.S. 880, 93 S.Ct. 85, 34 L.Ed.2d 134 (1972). The brokers in this case argue that this court should not imply federal liability for violations of stock exchange rules, as was held in the earlier Second Circuit case of O’Neill v. Maytag, 339 F. 2d 764, 770 (…
• United States v. Hall, 536 F.2d 313 (10th Cir. 1976)
  …. While we find no prejudice here, we nevertheless would suggest that it would be better practice to have sequestered the jury. . See United States v. Waters, 461 F. 2d 248, 251 & 251 n.6 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, sub nom. Robins v. United States, 409 U.S. 880, 93 S.Ct. 207, 34 L.Ed.2d 134 (1972).…