ROBINS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (43 total)

• Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder, 425 U.S. 185 (U.S. 1976)
  …gs against First Securities. In those proceedings all of the respondents except two asserted claims based on the fraudulent escrow accounts. These claims ultimately were allowed in SEC v. First Securities Co., 463 F. 2d 981, 986 (CA7), cert. denied, 409 U. S. 880 (1972), where the court held that Nay’s conduct violated § 10 (b) and Rule 10b-5, and that First Securities was liable for Nay's fraud as an aider and abettor. The question of Ernst & Ernst’s liability was not considered in that case. In their resp…
• United States v. Hall, 536 F.2d 313 (10th Cir. 1976)
  …. While we find no prejudice here, we nevertheless would suggest that it would be better practice to have sequestered the jury. . See United States v. Waters, 461 F. 2d 248, 251 & 251 n.6 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, sub nom. Robins v. United States, 409 U.S. 880, 93 S.Ct. 207, 34 L.Ed.2d 134 (1972).…
• Sanders v. John Nuveen & Co., Inc., 554 F.2d 790 (7th Cir. 1977)
  …rrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 410 F. 2d 135 (7th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 838, 90 S.Ct. 98, 24 L.Ed.2d 88, and S.E.C. v. First Securities Co. of Chicago, 463 F. 2d 981 (7th Cir. 1972), cert. denied sub nom. McKy v. Hochfelder, 409 U.S. 880, 93 S.Ct. 85, 34 L.Ed.2d 134 (1972). In Buttrey, the “know your customer rule” of the New York Stock Exchange was held to be actionable in private suits for damages where the defendant was alleged to have had adverse knowledge about a customer, incl…