SPAULDING

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (34 total)

• United States v. Oates, 560 F.2d 45 (2d Cir. 1977)
  …the chemist’s worksheet. In addition to these questions unique to this case, appellant might also have explored Weinberg’s per [*82] sonal qualifications and experience, see, e.g., Phillips v. Neil, 452 F. 2d 337, 347 (6th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 884, 93 S.Ct. 96, 34 L.Ed.2d 141 (1972); State v. Tims, 9 Ohio St.2d 136,138, 224 N.E. 2d 348, 351 (1967); Commonwealth v. McCloud, 457 Pa. 310, 314, 315-16 n.6, 322 A. 2d 653, 656, 657 n.6 (1974), and attempted to ascertain from Weinberg, the actual wi…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Carlson, 547 F.2d 1346 (8th Cir. 1976)
  …10 On the contrary, there are rare occasions when the proper admission of an out-of-court statement under an exception to the hearsay rule may run afoul of the confrontation clause. Phillips v. Neil, 452 F. 2d 337, 345 (6th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 884, 93 S.Ct. 96, 34 L.Ed.2d 141 (1972); see California v. Green, supra, 399 U.S. at 155-56, 90 S.Ct. 1930. Tindall’s grand jury testimony in this case was, as we have indicated, properly admitted under an exception to the hearsay rule. However, the ex…
• United States v. Sampol, 636 F.2d 621 (D.C. Cir. 1980)
  …is of the insured’s psychoneurotic state); Lyles v. United States, 254 F. 2d 725 (D.C.Cir.1957), cert. denied 356 U.S. 961, 78 S.Ct. 997, 2 L.Ed.2d 1067 (written opinion of psychiatrist); Phillips v. Neil, 452 F. 2d 337 (6th Cir. 1971), cert. denied 409 U.S. 884, 93 S.Ct. 96, 34 L.Ed.2d 141 (medical reports by unidentified authors); United States v. Check, 582 F. 2d 668 (2d Cir. 1978) (informer’s statements to undercover police officer). Appellants claim that the trial court placed improper restrictions no…