HARRIS
v.
CALIFORNIA

U.S. | 1972-10-10
No. 71-6451
Mr. Justice Marshall would grant certiorari.
409 U.S. 895 Supreme Court of the United States (1972) Caution
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • OIL v. Am. OIL Co., 528 F.2d 252 (10th Cir. 1976)
    …the employee for the retirement benefits to which he was entitled. For the Union to prevail we must equate compulsory retirement with discharge. We decline to do so. See Washington v. Jacobs, 147 U.S.App.D.C. 366, 458 F. 2d 785, 787, cert. denied, 409 U.S. 895, 93 S.Ct. 161, 34 L.Ed.2d 153. Although the end result of discharge and compulsory retirement may be the same, we may not ignore the distinctions made in the contract. United States Steel Corp. v. Nichols, 6th Cir., 229 F. 2d 396, 402, cert. denied,…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw